Tuesday, April 18, 2017

Is Screen Addiction Really a Thing?

Analysis of "Step Away From the Screen"

Interview with Mike Pesca and Dr. Adam Alter

By: Bailey Grijalva

            The screen of technology has become the new surface of communication and connection. However, when we are in front of a screen, we are not engaging with the outside world. In this daily podcast The Gist, host Mike Pesca discusses the trend in screen addiction with Dr. Adam Alter, which differ from popular addictions from the past. As Pesca begins his interview with Dr. Alter, he targets the audience by saying, “Just this once, listen to this interview.” This is an outstanding hook to capture the attention of listeners because it distinguishes how people in our modern day contemporary society have become addicted to their cell phones, or other screens. An interesting approach to the topic of the discussion, Dr. Alter starts off by simply defining his meaning of “addiction,” referring to an activity is done compulsively. In his opinion, anything can be considered addictive: opioid abuse, smoking, gambling, video games, and even pinball machines within an arcade.
            The interesting concept about addiction, as described in the interview, is that it defects some sort of personal use, resulting in financial, physiological, or psychological problems; however, it is known to treat loneliness and anxiety. On the other hand, previous studies also show that the overutilization of technology contributes to the increased loneliness, anxiety, and similar conditions. What is making this happen? As noted by Dr. Alter, chemical dependency is sometimes what differentiates some addictions from the others. For example, it is said that online shopping addiction isn’t really addiction, but screen addiction is because it relies on chemical dependency, like addictions to opioids. This was an unexpected correlation because opioid abuse is a far worse addiction than addiction to technology, but in a way, it does make sense how the two contributors made this analogy. Like any other addiction, however, access to technology brings some sort of happiness to the brain, which is something most scholars look at when determining the resulting effects of screens. For instance, when I post a picture to Instagram, I feel content when I receive positive feedback that includes both likes and comments on the post. Overall, these similar types of addictions, including shopping or gambling, bring amounts of euphoria to the brain.

            In relation to technology, the chemical dependency comes into context when referring to the amount of time we spend of the phone nowadays. Mentioned in the interview, the average individual spent eighteen minutes looking at a cellular screen in 2008. Over eight years has passed, and that number has reached up to an average amount of three hours per day, sometimes even reaching up to ten hours a day. But, here is the catch: The amount of activity on the new mobilized smartphone is primarily social media networking, rather than actually texting or calling, the common functions of the cellphone. As a result, smartphones are a new form of convergence because when we are looking at that cellular screen, we are not engaging with the outside world. Rather than starting up conversation when we are alone for only fifteen seconds, we look at our phone. Aforementioned, it’s the place to relieve loneliness and anxiety, but with this addiction continuously increasing, personal responsibility has declined while binging activities have inclined.